Farming policy

Now for the calculations to show your hit was not within the policy:

Profit to make minimum: 27.158.824 * 150 = 4.073.823.600
Here is the MIN profit that TMI requires
Hit for: 23.629.603.244 Kuwal Stolen

Repairs: (522k weapons + 150k supers + 375k UU price)= 1.047.000 * 19.017 = 19.910.799.000 Kuwal
This right here shows YOUR losses.
Actually Profit: 23.629.603.244 - 19.910.799.000 = 3.718.804.244
See where he took the amount of kuwal taken minus YOUR losses.
Real Profit: 3.718.804.244 - 4.073.823.600 = -355.019.356 Kuwal
Here shows the made profit minus the REQUIRED profit. Which in this case you under the required amount
Should Repay me: (2.458 * 1.047.000 (375K UU + 522k Weapons + 150k Supers) + 23.629.603.244) * 130% = 34.064.068.017,2 Kuwal
This section shows the repayment. Which includes his losses. This is how TMI policy is written.
The policy states that if your hit is found bad, then you repay the losses and the lost kuwal, and depending on the # of hit in the last 10 days a greater amount, be it 130% or 150%
Rounded down: 34.064.068.017 Kuwal

^SPEED^ wrote:in that case Nimras one of your alliance player adds what he looses and that is not right

crispy wrote:he only needed to take 12.45bil for it to be a profitable hit before calculating his losses. as long as he didn't lose 100k attackers and weapons i don't see how it isn't a profitable hit.

also, the current price of UU used for figuring losses is something that's agreed on by alliances, not the current prices on the GM.

doxakk wrote:

crispy wrote:he only needed to take 12.45bil for it to be a profitable hit before calculating his losses. as long as he didn't lose 100k attackers and weapons i don't see how it isn't a profitable hit.

also, the current price of UU used for figuring losses is something that's agreed on by alliances, not the current prices on the GM.

Why 100k attackers crispy? Assuming 375k UU (I have no idea what it is for TMI) and profit 12.45bil (as you say crispy)
38792 x (375K UU + 864k Weapons + 150k Supers) = 53,882,088,000 losses
61.85bil-53.88bil= 7.97bil
according to these calculations he did not make the required profit of 12.45

This is a response to crispy's post for the sake of discussion and has nothing to do with TMI and speed dispute, that is not my business.

crispy wrote:

doxakk wrote:

crispy wrote:he only needed to take 12.45bil for it to be a profitable hit before calculating his losses. as long as he didn't lose 100k attackers and weapons i don't see how it isn't a profitable hit.

also, the current price of UU used for figuring losses is something that's agreed on by alliances, not the current prices on the GM.

Why 100k attackers crispy? Assuming 375k UU (I have no idea what it is for TMI) and profit 12.45bil (as you say crispy)
38792 x (375K UU + 864k Weapons + 150k Supers) = 53,882,088,000 losses
61.85bil-53.88bil= 7.97bil
according to these calculations he did not make the required profit of 12.45

This is a response to crispy's post for the sake of discussion and has nothing to do with TMI and speed dispute, that is not my business.

my only question would be...how did he lose more weapons than supers?
first, pardon my interrupting your discussion, but Doxakk is showing the "costs" as in training cost, (150,000) weapons cost, (864,000) & the uu cost, (375,000). stars did not lose more weapons than soldiers (btw AW doesn't have "supers" anymore) stars lost 38,792 weapons & 38,792 attack soldiers... hope this helps you to understand

and as for my amount of 100k, i was making a rough estimate, and didn't have time to actually calculate the total amount of losses he would have had to have to not make a profit. got interrupted midpost but didn't want to exit out lol

crispy wrote:Thanks for the clarification kong, i need to stop speed reading and actually pay attention lol