Re: WR assaults there own for UU

by Nimras Wed May 04, 2011 6:45 pm

Admin wrote:
seaborgium wrote:I see what your talking about, but I see both sides currently. I guess its up to admin.
the raids get monitored. I wrote myself a script a long time ago that goes through all the raids in the logs for precicely this reason.
Filters out the non-interesting ones, then checks for sabotage/assault/assassination missions and for feeding activity like untraining/trades/raiding/protections/etc. to distinguish feeding raids from mass-raiding.

then if it's a group effort and still shows up on the radar, i only have to check 1-2 incidents per month manually
So to check for raid-feeding i need to invest around 1-3 minutes per week of my own personal time on average.

similar story with farming
as you may notice I already banned the first person temporarily for trying to screw with the PTR, more will follow

Aha and what if someone just got lucky and cought someone first but not the people who was working together and in such case the one getting truely lucky looks like the one behind it then what how will this player prove his/her innocent to you?

I mean its easy to be the one doing nothing wrong but because of "luck" is in the wrong place at the wrong time lol.

by Admin Wed May 04, 2011 8:29 pm

see the part about 1-2 incidents per month checked manually

by stars Wed May 04, 2011 11:15 pm

Lets just say Kenzu is , if we see someone with 1 mill UU out in open it is open for grabs, dont care what he has to say about policy or not because you are protecting and inactive that you yourself will end up raiding in the long run. So practically will skip you and just go on right ahead.

by ghyogod Wed May 04, 2011 11:36 pm

stars wrote:Lets just say Kenzu is, if we see someone with 1 mill UU out in open it is open for grabs, dont care what he has to say about policy or not because you are protecting and inactive that you yourself will end up raiding in the long run. So practically will skip you and just go on right ahead.

the banner has to stand for somethin. and in some culture the dead bodies are taken careof and buried Smile

)

by Admin Wed May 04, 2011 11:58 pm

stars last warning, i'm starting to get fed up with your language.
you already had 1 ban

by seaborgium Thu May 05, 2011 1:32 am

Admin wrote:stars last warning, i'm starting to get fed up with your language.
you already had 1 ban

did I miss the post that your talking about?

by Admin Thu May 05, 2011 1:35 am

see ghyogods quote, will edit that one too soon
that expression can be said in many different ways using less "colorful" language.

and that's just the start of the list

by seaborgium Thu May 05, 2011 1:41 am

ok, Yeah I didn't see it. I have seen his colorfulness a lot.

I just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something.

by stars Fri May 06, 2011 3:30 am

Admin all I can say is GET FED UP, because when I speak the truth I WILL SPEAK IT! If you wish to ban me off the forums then GO RIGHT AHEAD

by Whatamidoinghere Fri May 06, 2011 3:46 am

Lol, do you really think this is a good idea? Wink

by curumo Fri May 06, 2011 9:48 am

I would say that to stars it doesn't matter, really. He thinks he's right (and in most cases he is), he doesn't sugarcoat things (which is a refreshing change) and he says them as he thinks they are (which is as it should be). Sure a slightly more diplomatic approach wouldn't hurt - but stars is no diplomat. He is a pure and honest warrior and he acts like one . If people don't like that, well that I'm sure, is not stars' problem. I wouldn't want the bugger to change Wink

by Admin Fri May 06, 2011 10:01 am

stars wrote:Admin all I can say is GET FED UP, because when I speak the truth I WILL SPEAK IT! If you wish to ban me off the forums then GO RIGHT AHEAD

Whatever, you have your warning. I suggest you read your posts twice before posting

by seaborgium Fri May 06, 2011 10:14 am

curumo wrote:I would say that to stars it doesn't matter, really. He thinks he's right (and in most cases he is), he doesn't sugarcoat things (which is a refreshing change) and he says them as he thinks they are (which is as it should be). Sure a slightly more diplomatic approach wouldn't hurt - but stars is no diplomat. He is a pure and honest warrior and he acts like one . If people don't like that, well that I'm sure, is not stars' problem. I wouldn't want the bugger to change

TBH its reminding me of another person who would post the samethings.

by stars Fri May 06, 2011 9:08 pm

seaborgium wrote:
curumo wrote:I would say that to stars it doesn't matter, really. He thinks he's right (and in most cases he is), he doesn't sugarcoat things (which is a refreshing change) and he says them as he thinks they are (which is as it should be). Sure a slightly more diplomatic approach wouldn't hurt - but stars is no diplomat. He is a pure and honest warrior and he acts like one . If people don't like that, well that I'm sure, is not stars' problem. I wouldn't want the bugger to change

TBH its reminding me of another person who would post the samethings.

Who else posts similarly?

by Manadomiel Thu May 12, 2011 9:26 pm

@stars: I would think of Castravete Wink

. Spoke his mind using colourful language a lot. was no shutting himup either. The point of view is not the problem, apparently. Just the words used to express it.
On topic, I'd like to add that I don't see a problem with mass-raiding someone profitably. If he's inactive for over a month, there's no point in enforcing alliance protection.

by Kingofshinobis1 Fri May 13, 2011 2:45 pm

indeed but it will happen (especially in WRs case Rolling Eyes

) as alliances who keep inactives argue that they were protected or some crap when clearly they were inactive and should have been booted. whatever. i will mass anyone i see who has over 1.5mil uu in the open Wink

new rule lol.

by Mystake Mon May 16, 2011 6:19 pm

i say, 6k turns and 7days of UP out = inactive

by Nimras Mon May 16, 2011 7:26 pm

stars wrote:
seaborgium wrote:
curumo wrote:I would say that to stars it doesn't matter, really. He thinks he's right (and in most cases he is), he doesn't sugarcoat things (which is a refreshing change) and he says them as he thinks they are (which is as it should be). Sure a slightly more diplomatic approach wouldn't hurt - but stars is no diplomat. He is a pure and honest warrior and he acts like one . If people don't like that, well that I'm sure, is not stars' problem. I wouldn't want the bugger to change

TBH its reminding me of another person who would post the samethings.

Who else posts similarly?

Me lol heck ingame in the survays have i been REALLY colorfull because thats the only time ADMIN allows it and Martin/Admin you deserve it.

Beside that i stopped being here if i can avoid it as then i do not end up posting a tad to colorfull for the Admin who clearly think everything even a sentences thats not wrong or swearing to many as that heck saying bad things about the game without colorfull words can get you banned.

Admin sadly is a tad to ban and warning happy sometimes lol.

by curumo Tue May 17, 2011 7:56 am

Well Martin's a trigger happy guy - you should see him with a gun in his hands (BB - gun fyi) - now THAT's a fun sight to behold Very Happy

by mental Thu May 19, 2011 9:55 am

Fiddlesticks the rules WR assaults there own for UU - Page 2 Rock

by Sponsored content