raiding

does this seem right?

Mystake's army was composed of:
0 Super Soldiers, 181,134 Regular Soldiers and 0 Mercenaries
181090 Regular Soldiers were armed with Mobile Artillery
44 Regular Soldiers came unarmed
kingofshinobis awaited the invaders with the following:
0 Super Soldiers, 28,617 Regular Soldiers and 0 Mercenaries
4117 Regular Soldiers were armed with MLRS
4098 Regular Soldiers were armed with Mobile Artillery
538 Regular Soldiers were armed with Main Battle Tank
3570 Regular Soldiers were armed with Grenade Launcher
9533 Regular Soldiers were armed with Machine Gun
6761 Regular Soldiers came unarmed
Your field scouts report on the status of the enemy: The invaders deal 5,251,610,000 damage on the enemy!
This results in 160 casualties amongst the defending troops!
The defending forces return fire and inflict 187,131,739 damage on their opponents!
They manage to cause 289 casualties in their enemies ranks!


I mean, does it seem realistic?

I'm going up against 28000 units, of which 7000 dont have guns and I am sending 180 000 better equipped men. In any realistic war, the defender would be CRUSHED. Instead, 1 in 100 of their men killed mine, yet less than 1 in 1000 of mine killed theirs. I'm sorry, but if you were to look at it as 1000 vs 100, the 100 would get crushed.

Ever seen the movie 300??

well technically if you look at the 300 movie you will find that the 300 killed far more than that lol.

if you think about it, raiding means grabbing the loot first, and shoot back at anyone in the way second, while defendng is shooting at whoever comes at you.

Kinda hard to operate artillery when your arms are full of shiny baubles

what is a shiny baubles?

and do you know what raiding is? there's no loot, just uu. you're not sticking em in your pocket.

and the point about 300 was that in the end they get massacred.

when raiding, it is a targeted attack that goes after the units, then peaces out.

i dont need to send 1m units to fight 100k of them, I should be able to send less or take less damages.

Mystake wrote:does this seem right?

Mystake's army was composed of:
0 Super Soldiers, 181,134 Regular Soldiers and 0 Mercenaries
181090 Regular Soldiers were armed with Mobile Artillery
44 Regular Soldiers came unarmed
kingofshinobis awaited the invaders with the following:
0 Super Soldiers, 28,617 Regular Soldiers and 0 Mercenaries
4117 Regular Soldiers were armed with MLRS
4098 Regular Soldiers were armed with Mobile Artillery
538 Regular Soldiers were armed with Main Battle Tank
3570 Regular Soldiers were armed with Grenade Launcher
9533 Regular Soldiers were armed with Machine Gun
6761 Regular Soldiers came unarmed
Your field scouts report on the status of the enemy: The invaders deal 5,251,610,000 damage on the enemy!
This results in 160 casualties amongst the defending troops!
The defending forces return fire and inflict 187,131,739 damage on their opponents!
They manage to cause 289 casualties in their enemies ranks!


I mean, does it seem realistic?

I'm going up against 28000 units, of which 7000 dont have guns and I am sending 180 000 better equipped men. In any realistic war, the defender would be CRUSHED. Instead, 1 in 100 of their men killed mine, yet less than 1 in 1000 of mine killed theirs. I'm sorry, but if you were to look at it as 1000 vs 100, the 100 would get crushed.

Ever seen the movie 300??

your problem is that you are not going to war against him, because you sent your soldiers on a farm mission, where they focus on looting and not fighting the enemy.
If you want to go to war, you have to click the assault mission button. Then your soldiers focus on eradicating the enemy and your kill death ratio will be much better.

i hope we wont be having this farm/raid losses discussion again.

if you want to mass raid you have your options