For Lasting Peace
Page 1 of 6 • Share •
Page 1 of 6 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 
For Lasting Peace
Official letter directed at Ian / kilo and members of The Commonwealth and The Company
For Lasting Peace
You say you cannot trust me and don't think I have been honest with you.
Maybe you are interested in knowing the truth, why have I said the things which I have said.
It seems that you dont even know, who we are and you don't know our intentions.
We are members of the World Republic and we want to be free, not enslaved by others.
The most important for World Republic is honesty and loyalty.
I will forever remain loyal to World Republic members and our friends.
Therefore I will do anything I can to protect them and will never betray them.
Why is World Republic here? We are here to teach new players how to play the game and create a friendly environment for gaming.
We don't want players to exploit other players and we want that there will be fairness in this game.
We don't want one alliance to dominate all. It is prefectly acceptable that there are more major alliances.
In fact it is important that there is not only one power domintating all.
WR and The Commonwealth have similiar views, but we have different approaches.
Please respect that.
Discussing matters with us, telling us your policies and how you hope to settle disputes, it's all ok.
We are willing to hear to what you have to say. We can discuss things and come to a compromise.
This is how you should negotiate with us, if you want honesty.
Forcing us to do what you want, will not make us like you.
Be friendly to us and we will be friendly to you
and you will see it will be much easier for you to make rules, which will apply for everyone together with us.
I am not saying I have not been honest with you, but you should know that no one want's to be bossed around.
No one wants to be anyone's slave. We want to be free and you should not try to take away our freedom (like for example asking for access to our forum, without giving us the access to your forum).
What would an alliance be, if it is stripped of its rights, if they are forced to their knees with laws they dont agree with,
if they are forced to pay for something they have not done, and if there is always someone watching them
Of course you are a free alliance as well. You can decide what you like and what you don't, but if you truly want peace,
you shouldn't ask alliances to give up what they don't want to give up, and you should not threaten to go to war with them, if they disagree.
The recent ultimatums are very similiar to forcing someone to do or say something against his will and threatening to beat up that person if he doesn't do/say it,
you shouldn't expect that person will do it happily and you shouldn't expect honesty either.
Imagine a guy has been threatened by some people, that he has to give them everything he has, otherwise they will kill his family.
If they have the power to do that, do you think that a father, who has a wife and children,
wouldn't do everything they would ask him, if this could save his family?
Yes he would do anything possible to save his family.
You asked me to do and admit a lot of things and threatened to destroy World Republic, if I don't.
Obviously I will do and admit anything you want to protect World Republic.
Do you think that a guy, who values his friends and friendship would betray his friends?
No, he, under no circumstances would betray his friends.
You asked me to tell you the names of spies I have.
Even if I had any, I would never tell you, because it is against my beliefs to betray my friends.
What you don't know is that even though on the forum I stated I support World Republic members in their actions, I have sent private messages to everyone, who was an agressor and told them it was wrong and that it may never repeat and they would stand alone if it had repeated.
Zeroager even posted on the forum that I told him to excuse himself when he was in a dispute with another player.
This happened even before the 1st ultimatum.
World Republic is willing to help victims get compensation for the damages they caused.
Anyone, who has been unrightfully attacked should have the right to get his things back.
If you mass someone in any way, you should return what has been lost.
If someone threatened you, but didnt do you any harm, and you massed him, you should pay for half of his damages.
The problem is that not everyone has Supporter Status so it's not possible for everyone to return what has been destroyed.
Instead of solving this problem you were always threatening to destroy World Republic.
The right approach would be to talk to the people involved, to solve a conflict and make rules which suit everyone, even if it means you have to compromise. All without threats.
If you don't agree with this, I will be forced to accept all of your demands, but is it what you really want?
Please don't push us into a corner.
Instead of using threats and force, we should treat each other as equal partners and decide together, freely.
Please take your ultimatum back and let us try a different, more peaceful approach at solving issues. Without any threats.
Do you agree?
For Lasting Peace
You say you cannot trust me and don't think I have been honest with you.
Maybe you are interested in knowing the truth, why have I said the things which I have said.
It seems that you dont even know, who we are and you don't know our intentions.
We are members of the World Republic and we want to be free, not enslaved by others.
The most important for World Republic is honesty and loyalty.
I will forever remain loyal to World Republic members and our friends.
Therefore I will do anything I can to protect them and will never betray them.
Why is World Republic here? We are here to teach new players how to play the game and create a friendly environment for gaming.
We don't want players to exploit other players and we want that there will be fairness in this game.
We don't want one alliance to dominate all. It is prefectly acceptable that there are more major alliances.
In fact it is important that there is not only one power domintating all.
WR and The Commonwealth have similiar views, but we have different approaches.
Please respect that.
Discussing matters with us, telling us your policies and how you hope to settle disputes, it's all ok.
We are willing to hear to what you have to say. We can discuss things and come to a compromise.
This is how you should negotiate with us, if you want honesty.
Forcing us to do what you want, will not make us like you.
Be friendly to us and we will be friendly to you
and you will see it will be much easier for you to make rules, which will apply for everyone together with us.
I am not saying I have not been honest with you, but you should know that no one want's to be bossed around.
No one wants to be anyone's slave. We want to be free and you should not try to take away our freedom (like for example asking for access to our forum, without giving us the access to your forum).
What would an alliance be, if it is stripped of its rights, if they are forced to their knees with laws they dont agree with,
if they are forced to pay for something they have not done, and if there is always someone watching them
Of course you are a free alliance as well. You can decide what you like and what you don't, but if you truly want peace,
you shouldn't ask alliances to give up what they don't want to give up, and you should not threaten to go to war with them, if they disagree.
The recent ultimatums are very similiar to forcing someone to do or say something against his will and threatening to beat up that person if he doesn't do/say it,
you shouldn't expect that person will do it happily and you shouldn't expect honesty either.
Imagine a guy has been threatened by some people, that he has to give them everything he has, otherwise they will kill his family.
If they have the power to do that, do you think that a father, who has a wife and children,
wouldn't do everything they would ask him, if this could save his family?
Yes he would do anything possible to save his family.
You asked me to do and admit a lot of things and threatened to destroy World Republic, if I don't.
Obviously I will do and admit anything you want to protect World Republic.
Do you think that a guy, who values his friends and friendship would betray his friends?
No, he, under no circumstances would betray his friends.
You asked me to tell you the names of spies I have.
Even if I had any, I would never tell you, because it is against my beliefs to betray my friends.
What you don't know is that even though on the forum I stated I support World Republic members in their actions, I have sent private messages to everyone, who was an agressor and told them it was wrong and that it may never repeat and they would stand alone if it had repeated.
Zeroager even posted on the forum that I told him to excuse himself when he was in a dispute with another player.
This happened even before the 1st ultimatum.
World Republic is willing to help victims get compensation for the damages they caused.
Anyone, who has been unrightfully attacked should have the right to get his things back.
If you mass someone in any way, you should return what has been lost.
If someone threatened you, but didnt do you any harm, and you massed him, you should pay for half of his damages.
The problem is that not everyone has Supporter Status so it's not possible for everyone to return what has been destroyed.
Instead of solving this problem you were always threatening to destroy World Republic.
The right approach would be to talk to the people involved, to solve a conflict and make rules which suit everyone, even if it means you have to compromise. All without threats.
If you don't agree with this, I will be forced to accept all of your demands, but is it what you really want?
Please don't push us into a corner.
Instead of using threats and force, we should treat each other as equal partners and decide together, freely.
Please take your ultimatum back and let us try a different, more peaceful approach at solving issues. Without any threats.
Do you agree?

Kenzu- Aderan Super Soldier

- Number of posts: 823
Age: 22
Location: EU
Registration date: 2008-12-03
Re: For Lasting Peace
NO
When you atone for what you have done, maybe then.
You still to this day have NOT
1. revieled your spy
2. apologized for stabbing us in the back
3. apologized for slandering and lieing about us
4. the attacks on reyno PROVE beyond a shadow of a doubt that YOU still actively batter those smaller and weaker then yourselves and DO NOT follow your own "code of conduct"
We have not laid a finger on you, yet your here screaming like a little girl about how Wrong and Cruel and Abusive WE ARE??????
You want peace, then do what was asked of you from the beginning.
And Know what I said in the other thread still stands, With or without Reaper, With or without Ian, With or without any other player from TIE,,,,
You have a war coming.
When you atone for what you have done, maybe then.
You still to this day have NOT
1. revieled your spy
2. apologized for stabbing us in the back
3. apologized for slandering and lieing about us
4. the attacks on reyno PROVE beyond a shadow of a doubt that YOU still actively batter those smaller and weaker then yourselves and DO NOT follow your own "code of conduct"
We have not laid a finger on you, yet your here screaming like a little girl about how Wrong and Cruel and Abusive WE ARE??????
You want peace, then do what was asked of you from the beginning.
And Know what I said in the other thread still stands, With or without Reaper, With or without Ian, With or without any other player from TIE,,,,
You have a war coming.

Special Agent 47- Aderan Soldier

- Number of posts: 41
Location: Preparing for my next mission.
ID: http://www.aderanwars.com/stats.php?id=98
Alliance: The Company.
Registration date: 2009-08-22
Re: For Lasting Peace
Special Agent 47 wrote:NO
When you atone for what you have done, maybe then.
You still to this day have NOT
1. revieled your spy
2. apologized for stabbing us in the back
3. apologized for slandering and lieing about us
4. the attacks on reyno PROVE beyond a shadow of a doubt that YOU still actively batter those smaller and weaker then yourselves and DO NOT follow your own "code of conduct"
We have not laid a finger on you, yet your here screaming like a little girl about how Wrong and Cruel and Abusive WE ARE??????
You want peace, then do what was asked of you from the beginning.
And Know what I said in the other thread still stands, With or without Reaper, With or without Ian, With or without any other player from TIE,,,,
You have a war coming.
Have you even read what I have written?
I am offering you peaceful talks without threats and war.
Didn't I explain it well, why you shouldn't threaten someone to apologise to you and why you shouldn't ask someone to betray his friends?
Please read the post again.
Forget what has been said, let us start a new page!

Kenzu- Aderan Super Soldier

- Number of posts: 823
Age: 22
Location: EU
Registration date: 2008-12-03
Re: For Lasting Peace
NO shame u did not think of peace when u sent out all them PMs asking for spies in all alliances also bragging about 2 spies u have in our ranks to start with that is no act of peace u dug this hole now u are trying to get your self out of it as we are filling it in around u

reaper- Mercenary

- Number of posts: 25
Age: 32
Location: uk
ID: 13
Alliance: Leader of The Company
Registration date: 2009-01-21
Re: For Lasting Peace
reaper wrote:NO shame u did not think of peace when u sent out all them PMs asking for spies in all alliances also bragging about 2 spies u have in our ranks to start with that is no act of peace u dug this hole now u are trying to get your self out of it as we are filling it in around u
I am very sorry for that and I think I have apologised before already.
Please let us do this diplomatically, without threats.
You know that World Republic is powerless against The Company anyway.
We are no threat to you, so please don't fight us.

Kenzu- Aderan Super Soldier

- Number of posts: 823
Age: 22
Location: EU
Registration date: 2008-12-03
Re: For Lasting Peace
Kenzu wrote:
Have you even read what I have written?
I am offering you peaceful talks without threats and war.
Didn't I explain it well, why you shouldn't threaten someone to apologise to you and why you shouldn't ask someone to betray his friends?
Please read the post again.
Forget what has been said, let us start a new page!
I have NO reason to want peace from you. I DO have reason to want WAR with you.
Read what I wrote.
I am NOT offering peaceful talks with you.
I have not YET nor EVER asked you to betray your friends. I have told you how to end this peacefully.
Atone for your sins, correct what wrongs you have done, until then do not speak to me again because I have no tolerance for fools, nor those to feeble to see through the one leading them.
We have YET to do ANYTHING to you, but YOU have done MANY things to us.
How many more times will you ask for peace and betray it in the same week? same day? same breath?
Be careful your word Kenzu, because even an alliance leader will be held responsible for his words. And you have given me a clear path, one legitamate in your eyes, to destroy you and your alliance. I have always been a strong believer in the fact it is easier to ask forgiveness then permission. I'm willing to bet The Company will allow me back in their ranks when our war is finished. The cost will be great for me, in resources, in the lives of men, and probably my seat on The Company's High Council, BUT I promise you one thing, your losses will far exceed mine. Not only in resources, Not only in the lives of your men, Not only in the accounts of your alliance, but it may very well cost you that which you hold most dear. It may cost you WR itself.
Edit after Reapers post and Kenzu's reply
Now you beg? while satisfying it turns my stomach. At least the offering up of your account in the fashion of a duel was honorable. You would be wiser to stick with that. This brings shame on all of WR. Like Reaper said, you should have thought about what you were doing when you did it.
Be a man, and reap what you have sown.

Special Agent 47- Aderan Soldier

- Number of posts: 41
Location: Preparing for my next mission.
ID: http://www.aderanwars.com/stats.php?id=98
Alliance: The Company.
Registration date: 2009-08-22
Re: For Lasting Peace
You Ask for my honest opinion. here I go .
1. this post was a Bad idea , you made an impulsive choice with the TIE has Spies In WR , with out thinking how will they react to that post.
now your clutching at straws finding a way out of your bad post .
2. whether TIE has spies in WR or not , something of this importance should have been between you, Kilo , and Reaper, Or you should of narrowed down members who you suspected of being a spy and trapped them and kicked them out .
3. Its clearly obvious that you and the Leaders of TIE can never come to a compromise and your guys' personalities clash , maybe try sending the Second in Command of WR to handle all matters between TIE and WR , and you make the final decision For WR .
4. telling your enemy your afraid of him is NEVER a good idea. Even if you are afraid of your enemy you never show it.
Ambition Of Chaos

1. this post was a Bad idea , you made an impulsive choice with the TIE has Spies In WR , with out thinking how will they react to that post.
now your clutching at straws finding a way out of your bad post .
2. whether TIE has spies in WR or not , something of this importance should have been between you, Kilo , and Reaper, Or you should of narrowed down members who you suspected of being a spy and trapped them and kicked them out .
3. Its clearly obvious that you and the Leaders of TIE can never come to a compromise and your guys' personalities clash , maybe try sending the Second in Command of WR to handle all matters between TIE and WR , and you make the final decision For WR .
4. telling your enemy your afraid of him is NEVER a good idea. Even if you are afraid of your enemy you never show it.
Ambition Of Chaos
Last edited by Majhoka on Mon Oct 12, 2009 7:41 am; edited 2 times in total

Majhoka- Mercenary

- Number of posts: 18
Age: 22
Registration date: 2009-10-04
Re: For Lasting Peace
Kenzu wrote:reaper wrote:NO shame u did not think of peace when u sent out all them PMs asking for spies in all alliances also bragging about 2 spies u have in our ranks to start with that is no act of peace u dug this hole now u are trying to get your self out of it as we are filling it in around u
I am very sorry for that and I think I have apologised before already.
Please let us do this diplomatically, without threats.
You know that World Republic is powerless against The Company anyway.
We are no threat to you, so please don't fight us.
u ask for diplomatically and no threats all we asked was a name of spies u openly said u have and we are still waiting for so wot makes u think we will do wot u ask of us

reaper- Mercenary

- Number of posts: 25
Age: 32
Location: uk
ID: 13
Alliance: Leader of The Company
Registration date: 2009-01-21
Re: For Lasting Peace
i'm pretty new to this game yet and to this forum,
but i feel like posting so here's my 2 cents worth lol
don't tell people private stuff for one thing, like don't go around saying i have spies in your alliance etc. thats not to bright, second of all if somebodys member of their alliance attacks a member to another alliance you offer to pay for what was lost, if not accepted then hey, their loss,
3rd you offer peace, if it's not accepted then again, their loss, move on.
4th, never ever give in to threats, i don't care how small or how big they are, never give in to it, after all its a war game not a social club.
WOW i feel so much better hehe
G/L to everyone involved in what ever this all is.
but i feel like posting so here's my 2 cents worth lol
don't tell people private stuff for one thing, like don't go around saying i have spies in your alliance etc. thats not to bright, second of all if somebodys member of their alliance attacks a member to another alliance you offer to pay for what was lost, if not accepted then hey, their loss,
3rd you offer peace, if it's not accepted then again, their loss, move on.
4th, never ever give in to threats, i don't care how small or how big they are, never give in to it, after all its a war game not a social club.
G/L to everyone involved in what ever this all is.
LiL_Monsters- Untrained Unit

- Number of posts: 9
Location: United States
ID: 482
Alliance: [ Urban Empire (O) ]
Registration date: 2009-08-22
Re: For Lasting Peace
Ok kenzu - i ll grant you one last request - i ll take our ultimatum back as you requested. Thus there are no demands World Republic have to meet or accept - but there are also now no garantee's that The Imperium won't go to war.
You see - those ultimatums were your last great diplomatic ace - gifted to you by myself and Reaper. Had you met the demands, and The Imperium gone to war.. you d have had a very strong argument, and could really have played The Imperium off as the unjustified aggressor. Had you met those demands - Myself and Reaper were well aware of this (remembering we were in favour of a last chance and peace still) - and would have highlighted it to the rest of the Imperium - giving us a pretty decent argument/ answer to give to those who ask why The Imperium hasn't yet declared war. That ultimatum/ demand was your last real chance of peace - and it was my and Reapers last real chance of presenting a half-effective argument to justify our decision to hold back on an attack on World Republic by The Imperium, to The Imperium's memberbase.
But - that ultimatum/ demand is hereby withdrawn, as per your request. Your not required to meet any of those demands/ points - but likewise, it now means you have absolutely no garantee what The Imperium will do.
Your request that we withdraw the ultimatum/ demands has been accepted - the ultimatum and demands are now void, along with the requirement/ chance of meeting them.
Thanks
You see - those ultimatums were your last great diplomatic ace - gifted to you by myself and Reaper. Had you met the demands, and The Imperium gone to war.. you d have had a very strong argument, and could really have played The Imperium off as the unjustified aggressor. Had you met those demands - Myself and Reaper were well aware of this (remembering we were in favour of a last chance and peace still) - and would have highlighted it to the rest of the Imperium - giving us a pretty decent argument/ answer to give to those who ask why The Imperium hasn't yet declared war. That ultimatum/ demand was your last real chance of peace - and it was my and Reapers last real chance of presenting a half-effective argument to justify our decision to hold back on an attack on World Republic by The Imperium, to The Imperium's memberbase.
But - that ultimatum/ demand is hereby withdrawn, as per your request. Your not required to meet any of those demands/ points - but likewise, it now means you have absolutely no garantee what The Imperium will do.
Your request that we withdraw the ultimatum/ demands has been accepted - the ultimatum and demands are now void, along with the requirement/ chance of meeting them.
Thanks

ian- Aderan Miner

- Number of posts: 300
Age: 20
Alliance: You get 3 guesses as to which one
Registration date: 2009-04-22
Re: For Lasting Peace
This is all extremely tedious and tiresome from my perspective. Yes, I think it is clear to most if not all that Kenzu has made some communications/diplomatic blunders -- he certainly continues to clash with several key players.
With that said, he is an individual. Separate from that he is the leader of an Alliance. I can say that since I have been a member of WR, Kenzu has cooperated with other Alliances on the forums in ways that have improved the Alliance. I think that the "spirited discussions" on the forums have inspired him in other ways to do things that are good for the Alliance.
Clearly we as an Alliance have been going through "interesting times". Policies, organization, and leadership style have all been evolving. I think Kenzu has been evolving as an Alliance leader as well. The game dynamic has been dramatically shifting and Kenzu has been adjusting to the changes. He hasn't been doing a perfect job, but I wouldn't expect him to. During major changes like these, we need leaders that are willing to stick with it and change themselves. Whatever anyone may say about how well Kenzu has handled all of this, I think he has shown that he is willing to push through this evolution, however challenging it may be. I also think he has unambiguously demonstrated (at least some) good character and (at least some) humility with his responses to the never-ending series of ultimatums.
I do not expect anyone to not ever make mistakes, and I do not even expect a leader to be perceived as good all the time. I certainly don't expect other Alliances or other Alliance leaders to perceive this Alliance leader to be great. I don't necessarily perceive other Alliance leaders as being great either.
Clearly there is a lot of hostility that has built up against Kenzu from some players (however many). Justified or not, I don't think this hostility warrants a WR genocide.
Meanwhile, this is a game, and I have made some attempt to keep up with politics on the forums, but I have to be honest. These politics are very boring. To me, the big issues going on are posturing and obsess over semantics and minutae (there are exceptions). In sum, I can see why some WR individuals could arguably be targeted -- though I think 1:1 much more appropriate and interesting. I think the aftermath of 1:1 versus multi-Alliance massing of 1+ players would be much more engaging and interesting -- and better for the game.
I haven't read anything that makes me motivated to get into any kind of war at the scale of Alliances. I do think that Alliances openly and honorably declaring war on each other would be fun and I'm up for that in concept. But, I'd like to see that happen for reasons that are fun. I'd hate to have it for reasons that bore me.
I'm guessing that many/most/all of the folks itching to war with Kenzu are plenty motivated and would find it fun -- at least at the time. As a WR member, if I got sucked into an obviously unbalanced war for really tedious personal reasons that in my opinion clearly do not involve the WR at large, I am not motivated. I'd say let's come up with a good reason, then do it. Something we can get behind.
Dr. Seuss wrote an awesome book called The Butter Battle Book. Without going into details, the opposing factions are against each other because one keeps the butter side up; the other keeps the butter side down. Yes, bread. Anyhow, that would be a much better reason for a war in my opinion. It gives me a battle cry and everything. I can get behind defending my right to keep the butter side down. Getting behind "several folks have a major beef with my leader and so I need to try to take them out or just be destroyed" is just lame.
My real suggestion for stirring up a real war is music. Just try to take away my right to play disco. And just try to play country on my territory -- you'd be asking for it!
Anyhow, I'm just interested in the game being fun. I have had several interactions with players individually and have enjoyed these interactions with folks in my Alliance and not in my Alliance. For the most part I believe I found mutual respect with everyone I have interacted with (including shadow_Phoenix from our recent 1:1).
I think Kenzu has offered a solution to this current escalation that has the potential to shift things to an honorable plane -- instead of the tedium that has been ongoing. I suggest we go that direction and stick with it. Yes this is a game, but I also think it should be fun.
Caveat -- all the above is strictly my opinion. I do not speak for the WR. I do not expect anyone to agree with any of my "observations". I am taking things "seriously" only on the scale of "I play this game to have fun".
Apologies to anyone I may have offended -- I'm just looking after my fancy polyester pants.
And to finish my post: Sly & The Family Stone: Everybody Is a Star
Edit: just for the record I wrote this before seeing ian's response. I'll leave the substantive edits that I might have made had I been sufficiently motivated to make them as an exercise for the reader.
With that said, he is an individual. Separate from that he is the leader of an Alliance. I can say that since I have been a member of WR, Kenzu has cooperated with other Alliances on the forums in ways that have improved the Alliance. I think that the "spirited discussions" on the forums have inspired him in other ways to do things that are good for the Alliance.
Clearly we as an Alliance have been going through "interesting times". Policies, organization, and leadership style have all been evolving. I think Kenzu has been evolving as an Alliance leader as well. The game dynamic has been dramatically shifting and Kenzu has been adjusting to the changes. He hasn't been doing a perfect job, but I wouldn't expect him to. During major changes like these, we need leaders that are willing to stick with it and change themselves. Whatever anyone may say about how well Kenzu has handled all of this, I think he has shown that he is willing to push through this evolution, however challenging it may be. I also think he has unambiguously demonstrated (at least some) good character and (at least some) humility with his responses to the never-ending series of ultimatums.
I do not expect anyone to not ever make mistakes, and I do not even expect a leader to be perceived as good all the time. I certainly don't expect other Alliances or other Alliance leaders to perceive this Alliance leader to be great. I don't necessarily perceive other Alliance leaders as being great either.
Clearly there is a lot of hostility that has built up against Kenzu from some players (however many). Justified or not, I don't think this hostility warrants a WR genocide.
Meanwhile, this is a game, and I have made some attempt to keep up with politics on the forums, but I have to be honest. These politics are very boring. To me, the big issues going on are posturing and obsess over semantics and minutae (there are exceptions). In sum, I can see why some WR individuals could arguably be targeted -- though I think 1:1 much more appropriate and interesting. I think the aftermath of 1:1 versus multi-Alliance massing of 1+ players would be much more engaging and interesting -- and better for the game.
I haven't read anything that makes me motivated to get into any kind of war at the scale of Alliances. I do think that Alliances openly and honorably declaring war on each other would be fun and I'm up for that in concept. But, I'd like to see that happen for reasons that are fun. I'd hate to have it for reasons that bore me.
I'm guessing that many/most/all of the folks itching to war with Kenzu are plenty motivated and would find it fun -- at least at the time. As a WR member, if I got sucked into an obviously unbalanced war for really tedious personal reasons that in my opinion clearly do not involve the WR at large, I am not motivated. I'd say let's come up with a good reason, then do it. Something we can get behind.
Dr. Seuss wrote an awesome book called The Butter Battle Book. Without going into details, the opposing factions are against each other because one keeps the butter side up; the other keeps the butter side down. Yes, bread. Anyhow, that would be a much better reason for a war in my opinion. It gives me a battle cry and everything. I can get behind defending my right to keep the butter side down. Getting behind "several folks have a major beef with my leader and so I need to try to take them out or just be destroyed" is just lame.
My real suggestion for stirring up a real war is music. Just try to take away my right to play disco. And just try to play country on my territory -- you'd be asking for it!
Anyhow, I'm just interested in the game being fun. I have had several interactions with players individually and have enjoyed these interactions with folks in my Alliance and not in my Alliance. For the most part I believe I found mutual respect with everyone I have interacted with (including shadow_Phoenix from our recent 1:1).
I think Kenzu has offered a solution to this current escalation that has the potential to shift things to an honorable plane -- instead of the tedium that has been ongoing. I suggest we go that direction and stick with it. Yes this is a game, but I also think it should be fun.
Caveat -- all the above is strictly my opinion. I do not speak for the WR. I do not expect anyone to agree with any of my "observations". I am taking things "seriously" only on the scale of "I play this game to have fun".
Apologies to anyone I may have offended -- I'm just looking after my fancy polyester pants.
And to finish my post: Sly & The Family Stone: Everybody Is a Star
Edit: just for the record I wrote this before seeing ian's response. I'll leave the substantive edits that I might have made had I been sufficiently motivated to make them as an exercise for the reader.
Last edited by Disco_Vader on Mon Oct 12, 2009 4:07 am; edited 2 times in total (Reason for editing : other posts were made while I was composing this one -- and fixed grammar)

Disco_Vader- Aderan Soldier

- Number of posts: 46
Registration date: 2009-08-31
Re: For Lasting Peace
Special Agent 47 wrote:NO
When you atone for what you have done, maybe then.
You still to this day have NOT
1. revieled your spy
2. apologized for stabbing us in the back
3. apologized for slandering and lieing about us
4. the attacks on reyno PROVE beyond a shadow of a doubt that YOU still actively batter those smaller and weaker then yourselves and DO NOT follow your own "code of conduct"
We have not laid a finger on you, yet your here screaming like a little girl about how Wrong and Cruel and Abusive WE ARE??????
You want peace, then do what was asked of you from the beginning.
And Know what I said in the other thread still stands, With or without Reaper, With or without Ian, With or without any other player from TIE,,,,
You have a war coming.
I hate to tell you, but you HAVE attacked our members. The whole "we have not laid a finger on you, yet your here screaming like a little girl, etc..." (it's you're, not your btw).
Mitola, ranked #10, attacked a much lower ranked member in WR.
cmarius, has attacked at least 1 member of WR more than once.
So where is "The Company's" "Code of Conduct"???
Those are the ones I know about.... from only one member of WR.
Those are YOUR alliance members. Members of "The Company"
Are you in on this whole bully thing? No matter what happens, you're just threatening WR with WAR. That's all you want is war. WAR WAR WAR! Doesn't matter if we capitulate to your 3rd ultimatum or 4th or 5th. Every time we capitulate, we get threatened again for something else. It doesn't stop. You're always going to find something else to complain about. Did we breathe correctly today? THREATEN WAR OVER THAT! WR DIDN'T BREATHE RIGHT... THEY DIDN'T BREATHE THE WAY WE WANT THEM TO!
Special Agent 47 wrote:"And Know what I said in the other thread still stands, With or without Reaper, With or without Ian, With or without any other player from TIE,,,,
You have a war coming."
Know what happens to bullies in the end?
Edit after Vader's post:
I agree with this. Some people have their panties in a wad over things that have happened but have stopped. Then the Company has been attacking attacking members ranked 180+ and really wondering WHY The Company is complaining about any of this. It's politics that are beyond belief. Kenzu has tried and made the post to try some reconciliation between the alliances. Most WR members support this because they think war at this stage is stupid; over stupid things that most of them have nothing to do with. Most WR members don't read these forums because guess what... they are boring. My post is boring. Every post concerning these ultimatums and every attempt at diplomacy & posturing is boring. Only part of these forums that I bother with normally are the suggestions and bugs forums. NO politics there. Thankfully.
Last edited by Kismet on Mon Oct 12, 2009 9:02 am; edited 1 time in total
Kismet- Aderan Farmer

- Number of posts: 74
Age: 38
Registration date: 2009-04-01
Re: For Lasting Peace
No.
You repeat the same things Kenzu, always the same things. You always come with demands, you always accuse and point fingers, even here, in your would-be "on your knees for peace" thread.
You're just stalling, it is clear you don't want this war, but war can only be avoided through a change of attitude and I'm not sure if you're willing or even capable of doing that. You need to understand something: You don't get to make demands.
You act in your diplomacy like the USSR might act when confronted by someone like, dunno, the other half of Germany. That's not the power scale you're dealing with here so it would be best if you tone it down with the "holier than thou" attitude and keep quiet.
@kismet: WR haven't fully satisfied any of the ultimatums. And let me tell you, saying "I apologize because you want me to." is not a god-damn apology.
You repeat the same things Kenzu, always the same things. You always come with demands, you always accuse and point fingers, even here, in your would-be "on your knees for peace" thread.
You're just stalling, it is clear you don't want this war, but war can only be avoided through a change of attitude and I'm not sure if you're willing or even capable of doing that. You need to understand something: You don't get to make demands.
You act in your diplomacy like the USSR might act when confronted by someone like, dunno, the other half of Germany. That's not the power scale you're dealing with here so it would be best if you tone it down with the "holier than thou" attitude and keep quiet.
@kismet: WR haven't fully satisfied any of the ultimatums. And let me tell you, saying "I apologize because you want me to." is not a god-damn apology.
Sandwalker- Aderan Spy

- Number of posts: 364
Registration date: 2009-01-11
Re: For Lasting Peace
As a WR member I'd like to see those spies get outed... I mean seriously, hasn't that issue been played all the way into the ground?
Traveller- Untrained Unit

- Number of posts: 3
Registration date: 2009-09-20
Re: For Lasting Peace
Sandwalker wrote:No.
You repeat the same things Kenzu, always the same things. You always come with demands, you always accuse and point fingers, even here, in your would-be "on your knees for peace" thread.
You're just stalling, it is clear you don't want this war, but war can only be avoided through a change of attitude and I'm not sure if you're willing or even capable of doing that. You need to understand something: You don't get to make demands.
You act in your diplomacy like the USSR might act when confronted by someone like, dunno, the other half of Germany. That's not the power scale you're dealing with here so it would be best if you tone it down with the "holier than thou" attitude and keep quiet.
@kismet: WR haven't fully satisfied any of the ultimatums. And let me tell you, saying "I apologize because you want me to." is not a god-damn apology.
I agree with what you said about the apology.
That said, I'll say this, at times, language can be a serious barrier. English isn't everyone's first language and therefore certain things we'd say in the USA aren't as easily translated.
As far as the ultimatums go, from my understanding from the FIRST ultimatum, the only question was where to send the kuwal.
I don't remember what the 2nd one was.
Then there's the 3rd ultimatum about the spy.
I'd make a bet on a 4th ultimatum coming soon.. don't bet against it, you'll lose. They seem to like giving ultimatums.
I think a good bit of this is just simply a misunderstanding. Some of it is antagonistic - like from my previous posting, he wants war regardless.
Last edited by Kismet on Mon Oct 12, 2009 9:33 am; edited 1 time in total
Kismet- Aderan Farmer

- Number of posts: 74
Age: 38
Registration date: 2009-04-01
Page 1 of 6 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 
Permissions of this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum





