Re: Proposal: The DV Protocol

ian · by ian on Thu Sep 24, 2009 7:32 pm

Hmm, its a nice idea... but at the end of the day i think its not really practical sadly due to alliance's personal policies of dealing with things - even if they do sign up, you ll have next to no way of enforcing it since i suspect most alliance conduct goes unreported on this forum... and thus unless you have a good intelligeance network established into all the main alliances.. it can't be enforced lol

Its a neat idea - one which if you ever wanted to make and lead a alliance - you could make to be the centre of your foreign policy (i.e. aiming to get the smaller/ medium sized alliances signed up - and act as a political entity as leverage against the larger alliances to force them to abide by it) - but right now i don't think its practical lol

Nomad · by Nomad on Fri Sep 25, 2009 1:01 am

Kenzu wrote:Might be a good thing to add to the newcommer message.

attack to steal kuwal and raid to steal units is considered a normal attack, while sabotage, assassination missions, assault, invasion and destruction can lead to hate and serious wars.

Well not really because this will lead then to a false sense of security, since some may mass them for the things your saying is acceptable.

Jiro · by Jiro on Fri Sep 25, 2009 9:42 am

What about: Attacking to steal Kuwal or even units are inconvenient, but may be understood by the person being attacked. Sabotage, assasination missions, assault, invasion and destruction missions as well as repeated attacks are very likely to cause the target to lash out at you.

Admin · by Admin on Fri Sep 25, 2009 9:55 am

Attacks to steal Kuwal and units are unpleasant to active players (those who dont have 0 defense), but may be, although not always, understood by the person being attacked. Sabotage, assasination and the other strike missions as well as repeated attacks are very likely to result in more serious consequences.

added this

Disco_Vader · by Disco_Vader on Fri Sep 25, 2009 2:02 pm

Cool. Thanks all! Not exactly a cross-Alliance pact, but in my opinion still a meaningful step in the direction I was hoping for.