Add UP to ranked info.

Nomad wrote:Well that is far more acceptable to me, but I still hope it does not count against rank.

oh come on, everyone knows that's a silly thought

Wow, I am quite honestly suprised that this idea has kept alive. I really just expected Admin to lock the topic at that was that. Thanks guys!!

Osyndicate wrote:Wow, I am quite honestly suprised that this idea has kept alive. I really just expected Admin to lock the topic at that was that. Thanks guys!!

Why? Admin has always been fair and let things run their course unless it just to far gone to even be discussable.

Well its not that I doubted his administrative and fair abilities, I just thought that it was such a fast and direct disapproval that my suggest would just be tanked. I guess I was wrong =)

If it was to be ranked, be sure the rank was a non-rank effecting rank, such as War Experience.

Space2050 wrote:If it was to be ranked, be sure the rank was a non-rank effecting rank, such as War Experience.

yeah.

Give the up a rank, but it will not count to the global rank of each player.
I would like to see same thing for income.


players could see how they are doing and newbies would understand better that 4k is not enough.

I don't disagree with your line of thinking, but I still say I do not want my stats posted publicly, so as long as you see your rank and your rank alone I don't mind.

Nomad wrote:I don't disagree with your line of thinking, but I still say I do not want my stats posted publicly, so as long as you see your rank and your rank alone I don't mind.

On that note, maybe we can go partway without revealing too much if global aggregate stats were posted (and possibly made available at the Alliance granularity) -- like min, max, mean, median, etc. These aggregate stats would be very interesting for the other rank-related metrics as well.

Nomad wrote:I don't disagree with your line of thinking, but I still say I do not want my stats posted publicly, so as long as you see your rank and your rank alone I don't mind.

It would obviously not be public, that'd be like posting top income of game and that player get massed and turn farmed lol

Would most likely be like what space said, not exact number but a number range

Admin wrote:

Space2050 wrote:How about make a private UP ranking system similar to military experience ranks from Dune Wars and Gate Wars, but maybe make it not exact?

Ex. 1 Unit Production Rank: Top 50
Ex. 2 Unit Production Rank: Top 50-100 or Top 100
.
.
.
Etc.

See this is the kind of thinking I like.
Instead of arguing for or against, i.e. wasting time, look for ways how to make it acceptable for everyone

I can see no fault in it and think it should be acceptable for all.

i dont want a number range. I prefer a rank,
why having number ranges for some things and ranks for other.
Keep 1 type, rank

Nomad wrote:I don't disagree with your line of thinking, but I still say I do not want my stats posted publicly, so as long as you see your rank and your rank alone I don't mind.

other people definitely cannot see who has which rank.

It would be the same with all stats. Even now if you look at a random player, you don't see what rank does his covert have.

Kenzu wrote:i dont want a number range. I prefer a rank,
why having number ranges for some things and ranks for other.
Keep 1 type, rank

Nomad wrote:I don't disagree with your line of thinking, but I still say I do not want my stats posted publicly, so as long as you see your rank and your rank alone I don't mind.

other people definitely cannot see who has which rank.

It would be the same with all stats. Even now if you look at a random player, you don't see what rank does his covert have.

So, to be for sure I understand. You see your rank, no one else can see your rank, and its Raw or Total UP?

I cant find fault in Kenzus idea.

As for admins, if others can see it I like it better, if others can't see it I like Kenzu's better.

Yes, you can see only your own rank, and the economic ranks dont contribute to your global rank.